Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 425.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than Xperia Z5 Compact's 75.1 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and Xperia Z5 Compact has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with lots of additional features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is notably heavier than Xperia Z5 Compact, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a really bigger screen, a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1440 x 3040px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z5 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.