Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 545.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Xperia Z5 Premium, getting an 81.3 score against 79.8. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is noticeably newer, lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xperia Z5 Premium. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has a much sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 3840 x 2160 and more pixels per display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Xperia Z5 Premium counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4% more battery capacity. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.