Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 409.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xperia Z5, having a score of 81.3 against 77.6. The LG V35 ThinQ body has the same thickness than Xperia Z5, but it is a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Xperia Z5, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
The Xperia Z5 has a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a quite smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z5, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xperia Z5 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xperia Z5 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.