Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Green and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 409.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z5 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Xperia Z5's design is incredibly lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Xperia Z5 has 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory. Xperia Z5 has a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better photos and videos than Xperia Z5, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xperia Z5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much longer battery duration than Xperia Z5, because it has a 72% greater battery size.
Xperia Z5 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.