Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.7, 2.3.5 | -- |
| 2012-08-23 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.59 x 2.43 x 0.45 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.52 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21553 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 832 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lot better than T-Mobile Concord, having an 83.3 score against 40.6. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than T-Mobile Concord, but it is also noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior processing power than T-Mobile Concord, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a lot better display than T-Mobile Concord, because it has a really larger display, a much greater screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than T-Mobile Concord, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 has a way better camera than T-Mobile Concord, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much longer battery life than T-Mobile Concord, because it has a 100 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than T-Mobile Concord, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.