Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | HTC |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 5.0 |
| 2010-05-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 4.50 x 2.30 x 0.60 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.90 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 170 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is much better than the T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide's 40.6 global score. The HTC One M9 body is noticeably newer, incredibly thinner and just a bit lighter than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has the newer 5.0 version while T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide has Android 2.2.
The HTC One M9 has a really superior hardware performance than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide, because it has a higher number of cores, a much better graphics processing unit running at 600 MHz, a 64-bit processor and a larger amount of RAM. The HTC One M9 counts with an incredibly better screen than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide, because it has a lot higher 1920 x 1080px resolution, a much better display density and a much larger display.
The HTC One M9 shoots greater photographs and videos than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide, because it has a much better video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera. HTC One M9 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
HTC One M9 features a superior battery performance than T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide, because it has a 2840mAh battery capacity instead of 1300mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, HTC One M9 is also cheap compared to the T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.