Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.38 x 2.95 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 252.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P23 MT6763T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is way better than the T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, getting an 87.1 score against 60.5. LG Velvet is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, although it is also just a little bit heavier. The T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus and the LG Velvet both count with really similar CPUs, and although the LG Velvet has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG Velvet has a display that is very similar to T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus's screen, because although the LG Velvet has a little worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. LG Velvet takes much better videos and photos than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, because it has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG Velvet features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better battery duration than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG Velvet is a bit more expensive than T-Mobile Revvl 2 Plus, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.