Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
16 GB U.S. CellularSCH-I535
| Global Score | |
| 57.6 | 70.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2020-09-04 | 2012-06-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.59 ounces | 4.70 ounces |
| Graphite | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio A22 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8300 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III has a general score of 70.8, which is much better than T-Mobile Revvl 4's 57.6 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S III has the newer 4.1.2 version and T-Mobile Revvl 4 has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features. The Galaxy S III design is lighter than the T-Mobile Revvl 4, but it's just a little thicker and was released 8 years before.
The Galaxy S III features a more vivid display than T-Mobile Revvl 4, because although it has a quite lower 1280 x 720px resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density. T-Mobile Revvl 4 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
T-Mobile Revvl 4 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the T-Mobile Revvl 4 also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Galaxy S III takes much better photographs and videos than T-Mobile Revvl 4, although it has a worse video definition and a way lower 8 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The T-Mobile Revvl 4 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S III is a bit more expensive than T-Mobile Revvl 4, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.