Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-09-04 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.59 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Graphite | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio A22 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8300 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than the T-Mobile Revvl 4, with a global score of 71.5 against 57.6. Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat lighter but just a bit thicker cellphone than T-Mobile Revvl 4. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and T-Mobile Revvl 4 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a brighter display than T-Mobile Revvl 4, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each display inch. The T-Mobile Revvl 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the T-Mobile Revvl 4 also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy S III Cricket captures way better pictures and videos than T-Mobile Revvl 4, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels and a worse video quality. The T-Mobile Revvl 4 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal storage, the T-Mobile Revvl 4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
T-Mobile Revvl 4 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.