Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 57.6 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.2 |
| 2020-09-04 | 2014-03-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.59 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| Graphite | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 105.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 271 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio A22 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8300 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a global score of 60.4, which is a little bit better than T-Mobile Revvl 4's score of 57.6. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has the older 4.2 version while T-Mobile Revvl 4 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is a lot older and thicker than T-Mobile Revvl 4, it's construction is still lighter.
T-Mobile Revvl 4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have 4 cpu cores, the T-Mobile Revvl 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has a bit better looking screen than T-Mobile Revvl 4, although it has a lot lower resolution of 960 x 540 pixels, a lot smaller screen and a just a bit worse display density.
T-Mobile Revvl 4 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the T-Mobile Revvl 4 also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The T-Mobile Revvl 4 has a very superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The T-Mobile Revvl 4 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S3 Slim not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the T-Mobile Revvl 4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.