Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 55.3 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 4.2 |
| 2017-08-10 | 2014-03-15 |
| 5.98 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 119.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 267 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6738 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is a bit better than the T-Mobile REVVL, with a 60.4 score against 55.3. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has the older 4.2 version and T-Mobile REVVL has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim construction is somewhat lighter than T-Mobile REVVL, but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before.
The T-Mobile REVVL counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the T-Mobile REVVL also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a little more vivid display than T-Mobile REVVL, although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount per inch of screen, a lot lower resolution of 960 x 540 and a bit smaller display.
The T-Mobile REVVL counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the T-Mobile REVVL also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. T-Mobile REVVL counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 24 GB more internal storage.
The T-Mobile REVVL counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S3 Slim is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.