Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-08-10 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.98 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 119.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6738 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is way better than T-Mobile REVVL, having a general score of 79.5 against 55.3. The Samsung Galaxy S7 body is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the T-Mobile REVVL, even though it was released just a bit further than a year before. The Galaxy S7 has just a bit better processing power than T-Mobile REVVL, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Galaxy S7 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better looking display than T-Mobile REVVL, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater pixel quantity per inch of display. The Galaxy S7 features a very superior camera than T-Mobile REVVL, because although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy S7 features just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than T-Mobile REVVL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 200 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a battery life that's very similar to the battery performance in T-Mobile REVVL.
Samsung Galaxy S7 costs a bit more money than T-Mobile REVVL, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.