Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.1 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-07-19 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 130.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an overall score of 74.8, which is much better than the T-Mobile Revvlry's global score of 62.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has an older 5.1 version and T-Mobile Revvlry has Android 9.0 Pie. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a way older, thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than T-Mobile Revvlry.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features an incredibly better looking screen than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater screen pixel density and a much higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. T-Mobile Revvlry has just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the T-Mobile Revvlry also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a bit better camera than T-Mobile Revvlry, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a back facing camera with a way better 21 mega pixels resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with much more memory to install applications and games than T-Mobile Revvlry, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has longer battery performance than T-Mobile Revvlry, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 costs a bit more money than the T-Mobile Revvlry, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.