Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2019-07-19 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a general score of 76.1, which is way better than T-Mobile Revvlry's overall score of 62.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy S4 has older 4.4.2 version while T-Mobile Revvlry has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S4 body is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than T-Mobile Revvlry, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S4 has a way better looking screen than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The Galaxy S4 counts with just a bit better processing power than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
T-Mobile Revvlry shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S4, and although they both have a 0.33 inches sensor and a 13 megapixels back camera, the T-Mobile Revvlry also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The T-Mobile Revvlry counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 16 GB more internal memory. T-Mobile Revvlry features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S4 and the T-Mobile Revvlry cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.