Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| T-Mobile | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-19 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.85 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a lot better than the T-Mobile Revvlry, having a general score of 79.5 against 62.1. The Galaxy S7 is an a lot older phone than the T-Mobile Revvlry, but it's just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with just a little better hardware performance than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 features a way better screen than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The T-Mobile Revvlry has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the T-Mobile Revvlry also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S7 and T-Mobile Revvlry have incredibly similar batteries duration. The Galaxy S7 has a little bit better camera than T-Mobile Revvlry, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.