Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.632.6
Basic Information
T-MobileMotorola
Danger--
2007-09-252007-03-27
5.10 x 2.36 x 0.86 inches3.89 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches
5.70 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 200.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
3 inches--
400 x 240 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
155 pixels per inch102 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.85.2
processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotNo SD card slot
00.4
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
1540mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
96 hours standby time
6.8 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
3.362.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 1.1
--GPS

Comparison review

The Motorola W385 has an overall score of 32.6, which is a little bit better than the T-Mobile Sidekick LX's 29.6 global score. Motorola W385 is a somewhat thinner and much lighter phone than T-Mobile Sidekick LX, even when both were released only 6 months apart. The Motorola W385's processing unit is very similar to the processor in T-Mobile Sidekick LX, both have the same number of cores.

T-Mobile Sidekick LX counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola W385, because it has a way higher 240 x 400 resolution and way more pixels per display inch. The Motorola W385 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than T-Mobile Sidekick LX, although it has no SD card slot.

The T-Mobile Sidekick LX has a superior battery lifetime than Motorola W385, because it has a 1540mAh battery size instead of 950mAh. T-Mobile Sidekick LX counts with a way better camera than Motorola W385, because it has a camera with a way better 1.3 megapixels resolution.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola W385 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.