Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.334.9
Basic Information
T-MobileNokia
Danger--
2009-04-172014-02-24
5.20 x 2.40 x 0.64 inches4.58 x 1.98 x 0.52 inches
5.82 ounces2.95 ounces
--Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow
$ 200.00$ 145.00
Display / Screen
3.2 inches2.4 inches
854 x 480 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
306 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
76
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.32
Camera
3.20 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.72
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.90.2
Battery Life
1250mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
696 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.962.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 220 has a score of 34.9, which is a little bit better than the T-Mobile Sidekick LX's global score of 32.3. Nokia 220's body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the T-Mobile Sidekick LX. T-Mobile Sidekick LX features a more vivid display than Nokia 220, because it has a way bigger display, a way greater screen pixels density and a lot higher 480 x 854 resolution.

Nokia 220 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the T-Mobile Sidekick LX one, they have a 0-Core processor. Nokia 220 features a better camera than T-Mobile Sidekick LX, although it has a way worse 2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. Nokia 220 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than T-Mobile Sidekick LX.

The T-Mobile Sidekick LX has just a little bit longer battery life than Nokia 220, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.

The Nokia 220 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.