Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, having an 88.1 score against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone X is extremely older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone X features a bit more powerful processing unit than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has less and slower cpu cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X has a bit sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. TCL 10 5G UW has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage. TCL 10 5G UW has a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 66% larger battery size.
The iPhone X is a lot more expensive than TCL 10 5G UW, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.