Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 score. Although Google Pixel is noticeably older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is lighter and just a little thinner. The TCL 10 5G UW has just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel counts with a little sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density. The TCL 10 5G UW has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
TCL 10 5G UW features a superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. TCL 10 5G UW takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.