Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is better than the TCL 10 5G UW's global score of 73.5. Although the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
TCL 10 5G UW features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more RAM. TCL 10 5G UW features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The TCL 10 5G UW shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a way higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera. The TCL 10 5G UW features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.