Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting a score of 80 against 73.5. Google Pixel 3's design is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 3 has a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in TCL 10 5G UW, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. TCL 10 5G UW has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
TCL 10 5G UW has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a way more megapixels camera in the back. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.