Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting a global score of 80.7 against 73.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the TCL 10 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL has a CPU that is very similar to the processor in TCL 10 5G UW, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.