Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 global score. The Google Pixel 4 is an older cellphone than TCL 10 5G UW, but Google managed to build it thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better CPU than TCL 10 5G UW. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The TCL 10 5G UW features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB and more internal memory.
TCL 10 5G UW shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.