Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is better than the TCL 10 5G UW's general score of 73.5. The Google Pixel 4a is a much lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than TCL 10 5G UW, although they were released with only 2 months difference. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. TCL 10 5G UW has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
TCL 10 5G UW has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the TCL 10 5G UW, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.