Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's general score of 73.5. Although Honor 50 Pro and the TCL 10 5G UW were released with only a couple months difference, Honor 50 Pro is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Honor 50 Pro has newer 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a just a little greater pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a little bit larger screen. The Honor 50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor 50 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.