Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a 77.7 score against 73.5. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version. Although HTC One M9 is noticeably older and a bit thicker than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is still incredibly lighter.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a quite better screen density.
TCL 10 5G UW has much more storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW has a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 58 percent bigger battery capacity. TCL 10 5G UW has a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.