Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Diamond gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a 77 score against 73.5. Although HTC U Ultra is extremely older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores.
HTC U Ultra has a bit sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better pixel density. The HTC U Ultra features a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same video definition, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a lot more mega-pixels camera. TCL 10 5G UW features a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 5G UW. If you want to save some money, you can buy the TCL 10 5G UW, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.