Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a general score of 77.2 against 73.5. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 has 13 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. The Motorola Edge 40 body is way newer, notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 features a bit more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a bit higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 40 features a bit better camera than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
TCL 10 5G UW has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.