Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is better than TCL 10 5G UW's overall score of 73.5. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a notably newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, so it counts with a couple additional features and better performance.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.