Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is way newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a quite better display density. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes a little bit better photographs and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.