Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 73.5. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 10 5G UW.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display. TCL 10 5G UW features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with more MP. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery life is just as good as the TCL 10 5G UW one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.