Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, having a global score of 87.1 against 73.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer, a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than TCL 10 5G UW. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
TCL 10 5G UW has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a more megapixels camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better memory for games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and TCL 10 5G UW count with incredibly similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.