Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is a little bit better than TCL 10 5G UW, with a overall score of 75.8 against 73.5. Moto Z Force's construction is way lighter and thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Moto Z Force counts with a better memory for games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
TCL 10 5G UW has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. TCL 10 5G UW counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The TCL 10 5G UW takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto Z Force not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.