Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a global score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's global score of 73.5. Moto Z2 Force Edition's body is much lighter and extremely thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a CPU that is very similar to TCL 10 5G UW's processor, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. TCL 10 5G UW has a superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as TCL 10 5G UW. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the TCL 10 5G UW, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.