Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, with a overall score of 77.4 against 73.5. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z2 Play is extremely older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit worse pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Moto Z2 Play has a better memory to install games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Moto Z2 Play is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.