Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, with a score of 78.5 against 73.5. The Motorola One Action is an older cellphone than TCL 10 5G UW, but Motorola could make it lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Motorola One Action features a little more vivid screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
TCL 10 5G UW has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The TCL 10 5G UW takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola One Action counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW features longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Action not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.