Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a 79.8 score against 73.5. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's design is a little lighter and just a little thinner. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, so it provides some additional features.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more RAM. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper. Both have a display with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better camera than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. TCL 10 5G UW features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Hyper is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.