Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW, with a general score of 80.7 against 73.5. Motorola One Vision's construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, although it was released about 18 months before. Motorola One Vision features a bit better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Motorola One Vision features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW has a little faster processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.