Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's overall score of 73.5. Even though the Motorola razr (2020) and TCL 10 5G UW were released only 1 months apart, the Motorola razr (2020) is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, giving you some extra features.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger screen. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processor than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) takes slightly better photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the TCL 10 5G UW. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy TCL 10 5G UW, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.