Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Meteor grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting an 80.3 score against 73.5. Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the TCL 10 5G UW were only released 0 months apart, Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is just a bit heavier but also a little thinner. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little better performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. TCL 10 5G UW features a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes much clearer videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and faster video frame rate. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in TCL 10 5G UW.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as TCL 10 5G UW. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the TCL 10 5G UW, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.