Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than TCL 10 5G UW, with a general score of 76.4 against 73.5. Nokia 9 PureView's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released about 20 months before. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better performance than TCL 10 5G UW. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. TCL 10 5G UW features a better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video definition and the same aperture, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW has greater battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is way more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as TCL 10 5G UW. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Nokia 9 PureView, otherwise you can save some money and get the TCL 10 5G UW, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.