Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting an 83.1 score against 73.5. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a just a bit thinner and a bit lighter phone than TCL 10 5G UW, even when they were released with only 6 months difference. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide very similar operating system features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a better pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same video quality and a 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.