Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is a bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. Galaxy A30's construction is thinner and way lighter than TCL 10 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released around 20 months before. TCL 10 5G UW has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower pixel amount per inch in the display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a little larger screen.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more RAM memory. The TCL 10 5G UW features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The TCL 10 5G UW has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.