Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW's overall score of 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) design is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released many years before. TCL 10 5G UW has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The TCL 10 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen. TCL 10 5G UW counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 128 GB internal storage.
The TCL 10 5G UW takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition. The TCL 10 5G UW features a superior battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.