Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting an 83.8 score against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A50 is older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is thinner and notably lighter. TCL 10 5G UW features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A50 and TCL 10 5G UW count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.