Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, having a overall score of 85.5 against 73.5. Galaxy A51 is an older cellphone than the TCL 10 5G UW, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and lighter. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it provides you some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in TCL 10 5G UW, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a just a bit higher pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a same size screen. Galaxy A51 features a bit bigger memory for games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 has a bit better camera than TCL 10 5G UW, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a same resolution back camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
TCL 10 5G UW features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.