Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Diamond gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, having a overall score of 90.7 against 73.5. The Galaxy A52 is a just a little lighter and thinner phone than the TCL 10 5G UW, although both were released only 5 months apart. The Galaxy A52 and TCL 10 5G UW both count with very similar displays, and although the Galaxy A52 has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a screen with the same size.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A52 counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures just a bit better photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera. The TCL 10 5G UW and the Galaxy A52 both have very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.