Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a just a little heavier cellphone than the TCL 10 5G UW, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a higher number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution. The Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.