Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a 97.6 score against 73.5. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version. Even though Galaxy Fold is older and notably heavier than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is still much thinner.
TCL 10 5G UW features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Fold has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing power than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory. TCL 10 5G UW shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
TCL 10 5G UW features a little better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the TCL 10 5G UW, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.