Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, with an 82.4 score against 73.5. Galaxy M30's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 10 5G UW, although it was released around 20 months before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M30 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
TCL 10 5G UW has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M30. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M30, because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy M30 has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy M30 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy M30 has just a little bit longer battery life than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.